Winning the war on terrorism requires defeat radical Islam

On Wednesday, killing American air RAID cache just east of Baquba, Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Chief of Al Qaeda in Iraq and one of the terrorists active and most lethal. Shortly thereafter, the Al-Qaida in Iraq in a statement that reads "death of our leaders is life for us. Only increase our determination to continue to be the word of God. "After early car in Baghdad market.

Successful against Zarqawi airstrike diviobmint positive ongoing world war against Islamic terrorism. Anytime a killer place Zarqawi taken out of circulation, make progress.However, not the "radical Islam", and the ideology behind Islamic terrorism, the product of Zarqawi. instead, Zarqawi was like is radical Islam "products".

Presents radical Islam, also known as the Islamic movement which should be distinguished from Islam itself, arguably the greatest threat to international peace and security in the opening years of the 21st century. Diplomatic in nature makes it useless.

Diplomatic negotiation entails during conflicts. Pursuing diplomacy based on the assumption that a particular dispute does not irreconcilable. If the dispute cannot be reconciled, and the negotiation process may lead to a common platform that bridges the differences between the parties as the basic needs of all parties, even if some or many of their more ambitious or expansion.

However, you cannot continue searching for common ground unless the parties have less degree of tolerance. The parties must have the desire to live with each other, or there must be incentives to enable them to develop such a desire.In the first case, the diplomatic could begin without delay; in the latter case, it likely won't start, far fewer success unless the benefits to the critical threshold needed to break down the barriers that inhibit the willingness to live with each other.

Radical Islam is currently in progress that you want to live with its adherents to the "other".It is currently in phase of development where they seek to stifle opposing any Muslims and non-Muslims alike by prohibiting and intimidation and even brute force. Examples of intolerance "radical Islam" massive and ongoing opposition to load.

Their heads, made death threats against public officials, writers and intellectuals such as Ian Hirsi Ali free guidance and Salman Rushdie, who had dared to speak publicly against the totalitarian almost tried to force ... mokhtaran Bebe, hero against rape and illiteracy, in silence. They called for death pop star of her own video Deh Muslims and the song "what would ... appealing to women's rights and empowerment in the Islamic world; sought the mob execution Abdulrahman Afghans only" crime "is Christianity.They tried to force the Aftab Suhaila Ansari, a couple of Muslims in India, to divorce after Aftab had uttered "divorce" [divorce] three times in his sleep.

Radical Islam comprehensive new baby, this option is only possible in the guise of religion. "Having overcome fascism, Nazism, Stalinist, the world now faces a new totalitarian global threat: Islamism," a prominent Muslim scholar Announces ".Like all mwathikna fuelled by the Islamic movement fears and frustrations. hate wager on these feelings to form battalions to impose slips and world aonigalitarian ".

Currently, the search "violent" radical Islamists often to create succession world proceed without opposition among Muslims.May occur a number of Muslims who are increasingly concerned with the threat, against them. " After years of so-called ' whore, ' ' the devil ' and ' berenger shame "of people who use Islam as a shield, I decided to let the video speak for me," explains Deh adding, "I'm tired of people who clamor in tip below skin on Muslim woman but who will speak when subjected to beatings and even murder in the name of Islam. Zafar Khan Islam, Islamic scholar, Islamic leaders rejected an attempt to force local ansaris divorce, "that's completely unnecessary controversies and local ' Community ' or were ignorant of it. Precisely because resistance is increased among Muslims, radical Islamists "seeks" to hit these heroes and heroines within Islam. This evolution of serious consequences if possible.

Radical Islam is intolerant of pure and strict. It seeks to strip people of their consciences. And seek to deprive people of their most basic rights free thought and freedom of expression and equality law and seeks to impose servitude ideology and physical humiliation to all who fall under its rule.

Because he rejects tolerance and inconsistency, and "radical Islam" lacked basic elements that make diplomacy and diplomatic settlement possible.It seeks to advance the totalitarian ideology as a matter of religion. Complicating this Outlook largely the opportunity to reach a compromise.Religion of faith, not reason. either one embraces his teachings or nobody. Defines religion is one. Changes to basic issues can take decades, centuries or longer to occur. difference in time of the birth of Christianity for example.

In contrast, in reason, application logic on the set of facts, or information available can change one thinks very easily."Costs" to do so much less than him to change his religion, or modified. it facilitates greater flexibility compromises that make effective diplomacy.Minimum change exists, because logic issues mean no one, no one is.This Outlook opens difficult to reach a compromise.President Nixon's relationships with China or presidents Reagan Weghorbachif out of the cold war ideology restrictions are two examples.

Even with diplomacy is not a solution to deal with "radical Islam", this fact does not mean that the war alone is the only approach to address the global challenge it presents.Alternatively, could undermine the Alliance with moderate Islam such as free radical Islam "Lady" to seek intellectual domination of the Islamic world; deny its capacity to impose its will on the Islamic world, "radical Islam" capability to damage to the outside world would drop substantially.

However, even with the world seeks to form an alliance with moderate Muslim, it is imperative that they also rejects any attempts by "radical Islamists to stifle free expression and the Danish cartoons controversy or statement against the Islamic movement.In fact, perhaps the Danish cartoons landmark for progress, if they stimulated reasoned discourse on how the world sees "radical Islam" as he does.The split was raised in the West as the Islamic world.

Soothing demands radical Islamists "" cartoons or attempts to free speech by Muslims who speak out against them would be disastrous."Terrorize Muslims must encounter Cape," declared Ms. spared. "Civilizational progress occurs when exceeding individuals even paddling. Galileo Church abuse. as did Darwin. the concept of universal human rights hurts most religions. without breaking, there was only silence.

Accompanied by rejecting any kind of reconciling the demands of hardcore, this alliance with moderate Islamic reform could be hacked "overdue" eventually will triumph moderation on extremism. Meanwhile, could this alliance with moderate Muslims propaganda hash of hardcore to the outside world at war with Islam and will demonstrate broad alliance with moderate Muslims through example, not just words, it only hardcore war civilization like religious. turn, "radical Islam" will find themselves increasingly marginalized between Muslims and non-Muslims alike are being marginalized, as will wither and die like its predecessors completeness before it.

Need to give this task somewhat urgent. proverb Islam is not the problem today is only a "radical." who seek to redefine Islam to fit the totalitarian ideology for worldly power. but if victories "radical Islam" in the Muslim world today, a hardcore in successfully convert Islam upside to suit their empire of the twenty-first century, it surely will be problem tomorrow.

Sutherland's written on a wide range of geopolitical issues.